Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Alejandro Moro Canas Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the second serve performance over the past six months reveals that Canas has won 46.22% of points on their second serve, slightly outperforming Wild, who has won 44.37%. This statistic is crucial as it strongly correlates with the accuracy of match predictions. In terms of return game statistics, Canas exhibits an edge by winning 46.79% of their opponent's second serve points, surpassing Wild's 43.56%. For first serve returns, Canas achieves 30.06%, while Wild records 26.05%. These figures provide a valuable indication of favoritism in this head-to-head matchup.

Pressure situations also favor Wild, who has saved 58.33% of breakpoints recently, compared to Canas's 53.85%. This metric holds significance for making in-game betting predictions. Looking at overall performance, Canas has secured 51.72% of matches over the previous year, achieving a win/loss record of 30/28. In contrast, Wild has a win/loss percentage of 40.74% with a record of 22/32. This cumulative data offers an overarching prediction for head-to-head encounters.

Surface performance differentiates the players further; Canas excels on Hard courts with a 68% win rate (W/L 86/40), whereas Wild's strongest surface is Clay, boasting a 58% win rate (W/L 201/147). Both players show weaker results on Indoor Hard (I.hard), with Canas at 42% (W/L 8/11) and Wild at 41% (W/L 7/10). Additionally, Canas has contested mostly in Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 54.29% of matches (W/L 19/16), while Wild has competed mainly on the Main tour, achieving a 56.52% success rate (W/L 13/10). The level of the event significantly influences comparative statistics and predictions.

Considering the quality of opponents, Canas has faced players averaging a rank of 220.33 over the past year, while Wild has contended with those averaging 166.19, underscoring a higher level of competition. Live predictions and betting insight are also influenced by decisive set performance; Wild has a 53% success rate in deciding sets, outperforming Canas, who stands at 45%. Finally, concerning breakpoint conversion, recently Canas has converted 33.13% of opportunities, whereas Wild has managed 28.92%.

Evaluating these statistics holistically, Canas showcases a consistent edge in several areas essential for this matchup's prediction. Given this detailed comparison of performance metrics, Canas is likely poised to claim victory in the forthcoming tennis match. However, as always, current event statistics and player form during the tournament can further refine predictions as they unfold.